Structural
analysis is to determine the function or look at the elements in the
overall structure in which the relationship between the elements with
each other and relationally between these elements in a totality
(Piliang, 1999: 116). Structural
studies can be understood as a way of seeing literature as a system
that has many elements that are interconnected because of the loss of an
element in a literary work it will lead to lack of relevance of
literature with reality (Jonah, 12981).
Structural analysis is analyzing the relationship carefully all elements work together produce meaning thorough structural analysis is not a problem because the sum of the elements-anasirnya but what matters is what the donations given are the elements in relation to the overall meaning and keterjalinannya (Teeuw, 1984 ). as to understand the meaning of the poem poems have been structurally analyzed because structural approach is a priority task (Teew, 1983:61), ie by analyzing the intrinsic elements or building blocks of the poem.Structuralism is an approach that sees literature as a structure made up of elements that are interrelated with each other in totality and autonomous. Structure means the circuit layout between parts of a literary work or roundness work itself.
Literary works are autonomous, meaning awakened the literary elements in the work of literature itself without any influence from the outside elements. Means the totality of elements interconnected into a unified system and subject to the rules of literary works (Nurgiantoro, 2007: 36). Literary structuralism is an approach that emphasizes the elements in the (intrinsic terms) literature. The purpose of structural analysis is presented as carefully disassemble and, as much detail, as well as linkages and entanglement semendalam all elements and aspects of literature that together produce the overall meaning (Teeuw, 1991: 61). A literary work is the totality of a whole that is artistic. A totality contained in literary works have elements that are interrelated with each other in close and mutually beneficial.
Not wrong if a reader analyze a literary work with semiotic and structural methods because notabennya two fields are not mutually intersecting roads, but also not the same. But what is unique here is the linkage and collaboration when making two streams in the realm of analysis. While not as perfect as the champion of literary experts, could lead to at least two schools in the poem Three Battle Kumbakarna Triwikromo Triyanto work.
Structural analysis is analyzing the relationship carefully all elements work together produce meaning thorough structural analysis is not a problem because the sum of the elements-anasirnya but what matters is what the donations given are the elements in relation to the overall meaning and keterjalinannya (Teeuw, 1984 ). as to understand the meaning of the poem poems have been structurally analyzed because structural approach is a priority task (Teew, 1983:61), ie by analyzing the intrinsic elements or building blocks of the poem.Structuralism is an approach that sees literature as a structure made up of elements that are interrelated with each other in totality and autonomous. Structure means the circuit layout between parts of a literary work or roundness work itself.
Literary works are autonomous, meaning awakened the literary elements in the work of literature itself without any influence from the outside elements. Means the totality of elements interconnected into a unified system and subject to the rules of literary works (Nurgiantoro, 2007: 36). Literary structuralism is an approach that emphasizes the elements in the (intrinsic terms) literature. The purpose of structural analysis is presented as carefully disassemble and, as much detail, as well as linkages and entanglement semendalam all elements and aspects of literature that together produce the overall meaning (Teeuw, 1991: 61). A literary work is the totality of a whole that is artistic. A totality contained in literary works have elements that are interrelated with each other in close and mutually beneficial.
Not wrong if a reader analyze a literary work with semiotic and structural methods because notabennya two fields are not mutually intersecting roads, but also not the same. But what is unique here is the linkage and collaboration when making two streams in the realm of analysis. While not as perfect as the champion of literary experts, could lead to at least two schools in the poem Three Battle Kumbakarna Triwikromo Triyanto work.
CAN I GET THE REFERENCES..??
ReplyDelete